BACB ACE Provider · OP-14-2437• Founded 2010• 32,000+ customers• 140+ countries• V-CAT Consultation

ABCs of Preference Assessments

Special Learning · First published 2017-09-29

A preference assessment is a structured method to identify highly preferred items or actions that can be used as reinforcers to keep motivation levels high when teaching individuals with autism or other special needs.

How do we know what's going to work to reinforce the learner? Remember, an item only serves as a reinforcer if it increases the likelihood that a behavior will occur again in the future.

So how do we figure it out?

We can guess…

Although watching the learner and figuring out what their preferences are is the first step in conducting a preference assessment, guessing isn’t exactly scientific, and therefore, doesn’t qualify as true ABA.

So what do we do?

We can conduct a preference assessment.

Common types of preference assessments include:

1. Single item presentation: provide items one at a time to the learner, record the learner’s behavioral response and the duration of the engagement.

2. Free operant: several items are available at once, and data is collected on which items the learner engages with and for how long (Roane et al., 1998).

3. Paired stimulus (forced choice): items are presented two at a time, so that each item is paired with every other item, and the learner chooses one. Data is recorded on which item is chosen from each pair (Fisher et al., 1992).

4. Multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO): several items are presented at once; after the learner chooses one, it is removed, and the learner chooses again from the rest, which gives a ranked list (DeLeon & Iwata, 1996).

You can learn more about preference assessment by going here.

References:

Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 605–620.

Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 491–498.

DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519–533.

Copyright © by Special Learning Inc. All right reserved.

No part of this article may be reproduced without written permission. For information, email contact@special-learning.com.

If you want to go further

Video CE Library 1: 18 recorded trainings for behavior analysts

CEU Bundle: Video CE Library 1

Eighteen recordings on behavior assessment, staff implementation, social skills, collaboration, transition, ethics and supervision, with teaching from Michele LaMarche, Christine Austin, Erin Lombard, Peter Gerhardt and Jon Bailey. Declared BACB CE: 32.5 hours (25 general, 4 ethics, 3.5 supervision).

$199 · 12 months' access

See the library

Not ready to buy? The starter guide is free.

BACB ACE Provider
#OP-14-2437
32,000+customers since 2010
140+countries
2010founded

Authorization as an ACE Provider does not imply endorsement or approval of the ACE event content by the BACB.

Free Tools and Guides From Special Learning

Every free tool and guide we have is on our free resources page right now. No spam, just helpful resources.